History
has a habit of repeating itself.
Several years ago when I was an up and coming financial adviser I knew there
were some shady characters on the loose in the industry. In fact, the
governing bodies and the ethics councils made it clear that they
wished to know if we, as advisers, noticed anything out of sorts.
This form of self policing is pretty effective when you know you are
being scrutinized by a governing body and virtually everyone with
whom you are in competition.
I supposed
you could imagine my surprise when I learned one of my best friends
from grade school and high school – who was himself a financial
adviser – was charged and convicted with fraud after bilking his
clients for almost $400,000.
It wasn't
the easiest thing to face knowing someone with whom I had been close was
guilty of such a crime. It's just not a thought that goes through my
mind when I'm associating with people. What motivates someone who
seemed to have everything going for them to do such a thing to other
people? It's beyond my comprehension, no matter how I try to discern
the thought process that would lead someone I trusted down such a path. Quite frankly, I just don't get it, you know?
It seems
it has all happened again.
It is a
different friend and a different accusation. The emotions attached
are the same; shock and disbelief. This was someone I worked with in
my professional life and on committees. It was someone I admired for
their creativity. It was someone I hung out with on occasion and
attended parties with. It was someone many of my friends know and I
am sure felt similarly about him as I did. He was someone I admired.
Trust the
dog and everyone else is suspect.
When
events like this come to light, I tend to turn inward and
wonder who it is I can trust. Both instances set me back. If I can't
trust people who are this close, who can I trust? Is my judgment that
far off the mark? I wouldn't have chosen either of these men to
commit the crimes they had. (Albeit one guilty and the other innocent
until proven otherwise.) Both I would label as nice guys and
upstanding citizens.
I consider
myself to be a nice guy (mostly) and an upstanding citizen. How do
people look at me? Guilty by association? Do I get sideways glances I
am unaware of? Do people trust me? These are all thoughts that run
through my head at times like these.
What makes me immune to scrutiny?
I think I
still have to trust. I have to be able to put some faith in people. I
have to trust my gut to determine whether someone is a threat to me
or not. I have to be able to allow myself to be seen by others
without fear of consequence. It's not an easy thing trusting others.
It's the bravest thing we will ever do. And yet, without that
bravery, we are no more than an empty shell living an empty life on a deserted island of our own making.
The jury
is still out about my feelings around this latest revelation. It's a big deal and something that is diametrically opposed to virtually everything I stand for. I can't
seem to get a grip on the dichotomy between what I thought I knew and
what I now know. Of course, it's still fresh yet it's a conundrum all the same.
Its scope is perception altering.
The best I
can do is trust myself to know to whom I bare my soul and to whom I close the iron door. In the end, that trust in myself, is all I have.
Namaste
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave comments here.